









| |
10 Oct 2008
Read part of Sophie's
World, the surprising best-seller from 1995 which is really just an
introductory philosophy textbook, in the guise of novel. The book says
that Baruch Spinoza
(1632-1671) was one of the first of the first proponents of pantheism,
namely the theory that God and Nature are one in the same. Pantheism
rejects the view that there is a "personal god" that listens to
prayers and rewards/punishes people. Spinoza
believed that people cannot comprehend all of God/Nature. He was also a
determinist in the sense that he thought that God/Nature was ruled by a set of
laws and principles that we cannot fully fathom but that govern our lives and
cause us to have feelings and make decisions. He believed that good and
evil were both natural aspects of the universe, and that there is no inherent
right or wrong, except to the extent that human happiness should be maximized.
Einstein is perhaps the most famous modern adherent of the principles of
pantheism.
4 Oct 2008
Read The Chilling Stars, by Henrik_Svensmark,
a science book with a controversial hypothesis: that earth's historical
temperature fluctuations (including global warming) are due to the
rise and fall of the amount of cosmic radiation reaching the earth's lower
atmosphere. The theory is that more radiation generates tiny specks of
particles in the air, which serves as starters for condensation, hence more
clouds ... so more radiation means more clouds means cooler temperatures, and
vice versa. The book says that there are several forces that cause
the amount of radiation to fluctuate: (1) earths magnetic field
getting stronger or weaker (stronger field -> less radiation);
(2) the sun's magnetic field strength fluctuating (stronger -> less
radiation reaching earth); and (3) the movement of the solar system
thru the Milky Way galaxy (passage thru a dense-star region -> more radiation
from those stars, especially when passing thru a region with active
stars). The author says he was ridiculed and ostracized by most other
scientists who had a vested interest in the greenhouse gas theory of global
warming.
1 Oct 2008
Read In
Flanders Fields by Leon Wolff (1958). A balanced description of a
key 1917 battle in WW I (sadly, there were more than one: Somme and Verdun
were other, equally tragic episodes). A rather disturbing account that indicts the
British war leaders, especially General
Haig. Prime Minister David
Lloyd George tried to stop the useless battles, but failed. Lloyd
George said "If people really knew, the war would be stopped tomorrow. But
of course they don't know, and can't know. The correspondents don't write and
the censorship wouldn't pass the truth. What they do send is not the war, but
just a pretty picture of the war with everybody doing gallant deeds. The thing
is horrible and beyond human nature to bear and I feel I can't go on with this
bloody business."
The book ends with a quote from
Carlyle's Sartor Resartus:
... there dwell and toil, in the British village of Dumdrudge, usually some
five hundred souls. From these, by certain 'Natural Enemies' of the French,
there are successively selected, during the French war, say thirty able-bodied
men; Dumdrudge, at her own expense, has suckled and nursed them: she has, not
without difficulty and sorrow, fed them up to manhood, and even trained them to
crafts, so that one can weave, another build, another hammer, and the weakest
can stand under thirty stone avoirdupois. Nevertheless, amid much weeping and
swearing, they are selected; all dressed in red; and shipped away, at the public
charges, some two thousand miles, or say only to the south of Spain; and fed
there till wanted. And now to that same spot, in the south of Spain, are thirty
similar French artisans, from a French Dumdrudge, in like manner wending: till
at length, after infinite effort, the two parties come into actual
juxtaposition; and Thirty stands fronting Thirty, each with a gun in his hand.
Straightaway the word 'Fire!' is given; and they blow the souls out of one
another; and in place of sixty brisk useful craftsmen, the world has sixty dead
carcasses, which it must bury, and anew shed tears for. Had these men any
quarrel? Busy as the Devil is, not the smallest! They lived far enough apart;
were the entirest strangers; nay, in so wide a Universe, there was even,
unconsciously, by Commerce, some mutual helpfulness between them. How then?
Simpleton! their Governors had fallen out; and instead of shooting one another,
had the cunning to make these poor blockheads shoot.
Reminds me of that Pink Floyd song Us
and Them:
Forward he cried from the rear
and the front rank died.
And the general sat and the lines on the map
moved from side to side.
20 Sept 2008
I wrote a cool utility program called DiskZoom, here.
The genesis of the program is that I ran out of disk space, and needed to
free-up some space. I knew I had tons of large, old files out there, but
finding them would be difficult. I googled around to see if there were any
tools that would help, and I stumbled upon OverDisk
- it was an okay program, but I thought I could do better. I was
motivated because I'd never written a pure Windows program before (until now,
all my programming was in Unix, or VST, or VB). So I sat down to
write it: took about 40 hours, but I've got v1.0 ready to
go.
The fun part was exploring all the low-level Windows disk/directory
functions. I just used the "old" Win32 API, although they also
have an object-oriented API available, but you have to link-in a lot more
garbage to use it. The zipped DiskZoom executable is only 70KB.
Publicizing DiskZoom will not be easy. I've got it sitting here on my
site, but now what? I uploaded it to downloads.com, but they want you to
pay $$, and if you upload for free (like I did) they generally make your product
impossible to find. And you're not supposed to create Wikipedia
pages for promoting products. About the only hope I have of anyone
ever finding DiskZoom is if Google or Yahoo indexes my site, and then someone
types in the precise set of search terms that align with my DiskZoom page's
contents. Oh well, I hope some poor soul with a full disk happens
upon it and finds it useful.
19 Sept 2008
Whoa. Just saw a great, great move: Unconditional
Love. I can't believe I've never heard about it
before. Funny, touching, visually inspirational. Reminds me of the
surprise and warmth I felt when watching Strictly
Ballroom or Harold and Maude
or The Life Aquatic. The
most surprising thing about the movie was that Jonathon Pryce sang all his own
vocals, though that makes sense since he starred in the musical Miss Saigon.
Speaking of Jonathon Pryce, a long time ago I saw this hilarious British
farce, Consuming Passions, and
Id love to see it again, but it is not available on Netflix :-(
16 Sept 2008
We are in the midst of a large banking crisis. Many banks, wall street
firms, and mortgage companies are struggling, some going bankrupt (AIG
insurance, Countrywide lending, Merrill-Lynch). The root cause is that
lenders, mostly home lenders, made loans to house buyers who could not afford
the loan. These loans were called "sub-prime" loans and were
generally characterized by: mortgage payments that were smaller than the
monthly interest; balloon payments; low or no down payment; loan
principle was nearly the full cost of the house (or more!).
These loans were highly risky, and no reasonable lender would have made
them. Why did the lenders make them? In one sentence: because the
federal government was interfering with the free market. Normally, when a
lender makes a bad loan, they are stuck with the consequences, and lose
money. Loans are frequently sold between companies (either to other
lenders, or to investors that treat them as bonds or any other interest-bearing
investment). When a loan is risky, the selling price is driven down to
reflect the odds that the borrower may default. The selling price should
have been low on the sub-prime loans because they were so risky.
Enter the federal government: They created two non-profit
lending/investment companies: FannieMae and FreddieMac. These are
quasi-governmental organizations (much like the post office;, or the Smithsonian
Institution; or the NEA) that have no motivation to stay solvent. The
intention behind their creation was good: to ensure that lower-income folks can
buy homes. The problem is: FM and FM bought risky sub-prime loans
from lenders at HIGH prices, ignoring the risk. Thus, commercial lenders
(banks, CountryWide, etc) could make a risky loan, keep the start-up fee
(usually around $1,000) then sell the loan immediately to FM. No
reasonable or for-profit organization would pay full price for these loans, but
FM/FM did. And they bought lots. In fact, nearly every lender
in America resold its loans to FM/FM. So, when home owners started
defaulting on the loans, FM/FM was stuck with tens of thousands of loans,
secured by land worth less than the loan.
Naturally, the federal government stepped in and gave FM/FM cash to bail them
out. Countrywide and the other original lenders are laughing all the
way to the bank: they've pocketed the loan start-up fees. The
taxpayers are stuck with the bill.
Where did the money go? Who benefits? This transfer of
wealth went from the middle class to who? There were several
beneficiaries: The original lenders made commissions on risk loans;
the home borrowers get to keep houses they cant afford (at least they tend to be
lower-income); and investment companies like FM, FM, AIG, and so on get
bailed-out by the federal government. AIG is a private,
for-profit insurance company and they are getting cash from the
government.
This is very, very reminiscent of the Savings and Loan bail-out
of the 1980s: Savings and Loans made unsecured loans to the friends and relatives
of the S&L owners; the borrowers kept the money and never repaid the
loans; the S&Ls went bankrupt; and the federal government stepped in
and gave cash to the S&Ls so they could shut-down and pay-off all the people
that had money in savings accounts. In that case, the money was transferred
from taxpayers to the friends and relatives of the S&L owners.
Also, this is similar to the 1998 bailout of LTCM,
a hedge fund run by and for the super rich. The federal government
organized a multi-billion dollar bailout, lest the collapse of LTCM trigger a
world-wide panic. See a pattern here?
9 Sept 2008
The publisher of my favorite poster, Theodore Gray, started selling a new
product, where he prints-out your name with the elements here.
Neal Olander is cool: Ne Al -- O La Nd Er. Unfortunately, Stella
cannot be rendered with element abbreviations :-(
Read a book about North Korea: bizarre regime! Speaking of
revolutions (see 6 Sept below), if anyone should revolt, it is the people of
that country. This brings to mind a crazy building they have in their
capital, Pyongyang: they build a huge hotel ..1,000 feet high, with seven
revolving restaurants at the top. They ran out of money, and it stands
empty, decaying in the middle of their city. What an eyesore. What
do the people think?
I thought of another fun project: I could create a poster that
illustrates famous mathematical concepts: formulas, theorems,
puzzles. I'll have to see if such a poster already exists.
6 Sept 2008
Les Miserables ...
great novel, great musical. Never saw the musical. Never finished
the novel. But I have heard excerpts from the musical, and there is no denying
the stirring effect of the "Do You Hear the People Sing?"
finale. I'm sure most people in the audience, at that moment, resolve to
go home and begin righting wrongs and fighting oppression (a good night's sleep
cures them of that :-) But I've always been puzzled: The novel
takes place in 1815 to 1830s, and the "revolution" scenes are in
1831/1832. What revolution are we witnessing? The French revolution
was in 1789 ("let them eat cake" and the guillotine). One would
think that such a phenomenally successful musical would be based on, say, the
1789 revolution, or the Russian revolution, or the American revolution, or the
Chinese revolution, or Ho Chi Mihn. What exactly was the revolution of
1831? Wikipedia says it was an anti-Orleanist
revolt of June 1832. I suppose what happened was that the play was
written by Frenchmen for French audiences, who would understand the 1831
revolution. As the play became successful outside France, the lack
of understanding by the audiences was probably a concern to the producers, but
in the end proved inconsequential. In the novel: the story
line, characters, and plot make the details of the revolution rather
unimportant. But in the musical, the stirring music makes the revolution
much more prominent. I'm just a bit puzzled that the musical resonates
so strongly with audiences despite the fact the audiences are unfamiliar with
the revolution being depicted.
This disconnect reminds
me a bit of Fidelio by Beethoven: I saw a production of it set in some anonymous
Latin American banana republic: The opera was inspirational in spite of
the fact that it was in an anonymous country at an anonymous point in time.
5 Sept 2008
Great article
on Strunk and White.
Here is my favorite line, from White's introduction:
His rule 11 was 'make definite assertions'. ... He scorned
the vague, ..., the irresolute. He felt it was worse to be irresolute
than to be wrong. I remember a day in class when he ... croaked "If
you don't know how to pronounce a word, say it loud! If you don't
know how to pronounce a word, say it loud!" Why compound
ignorance with inaudibility? Why run and hide it?
4 Sept 2008
I'm thinking about a
new project I can embark on: publishing self-help legal guides on the
web. This is something I believe strongly in, and it is an idea
whose time has come. I'd probably focus on Washington state, although
Idaho could be a candidate too. California already has lots of self-help
info. For Washington, I see there is already a site that gives
guidance on probate and guardianship: http://www.wa-probate.com/
, published by a Seattle attorney named Richard Wills (a retired attorney from
California). The Washington State Bar web site, of course, contains
no self-help information at all. Since probate info is already
available, maybe I could publish will information? or perhaps small claims
court?
2 Sept 2008
I have a new
hero: Carl Malamud.
He is an advocate for open government and his organization public.resource.org
has scanned several key government
documents (building codes, civil codes, medical billing/insurance terms/codes)
and made them available on-line (mostly
California?). Some states copyright those laws, and charge citizens
for books (or CDs) of the laws. That is highly undemocratic, and I knew it
happened for Building Codes (e.g. the Electrical code, which is managed and
published by a private industry group, but included in California law "by
reference") but I had no idea it was also done for other laws.
Apparently LexisNexus is a big player in this field. Clearly he will win
in court, but he'll face a lengthy
battle. Even such fundamental legal documents as
supreme court decisions and federal appeal court decisions are only available in
hardcopy books, copyrighted by Westlaw and a couple of other
companies. Malamud's organization is trying to scan those and make
them available online.
Supporting http://public.resource.org
is the Electronic Freedom Foundation and Creative
Commons.
I believe that Washington state's code is available on the internet, but
certainly its Building Code is not.
There is a precedent for eliminating copyrights on
public laws: in Veeck
v. Southern Building Code Congress, 293 F.3d 791, the United States Court of
Appeals, Fifth Circuit, met en banc “because of the novelty and
importance of the issues” presented before the court: “The issue
in this en banc case is the extent to which a private organization may
assert copyright protection for its model codes, after the models have been
adopted by a legislative body and become 'the law'. Specifically, may a
code-writing organization prevent a website operator from posting the text of a
model code where the code is identified simply as the building code of a city
that enacted the model code as law?” In an exhaustive opinion that
carefully traced the reasons why our laws must be public, the Honorable Chief
Judge Edith H. Jones stated the conclusion of the court: “Our
short answer is that as law, the model codes enter the public domain and are not
subject to the copyright holder's exclusive prerogatives.”
Unfortunately, that decision was a 5-4 decision, so it was not a sure thing.
This is reminiscent of a situation several years ago
where a friend's father died in Idaho. The friend wanted to do a simple
probate for the estate, but the state's probate documents were not publicly
available. Idaho lawyers had managed to suppress the forms, so that
bereaving relatives were forced to hire a probate attorney in order to access
the courts (lawyer's fee is 1% of the estate). At least in California, the
Nolo press makes all common court documents available, although you do have have
to purchase them at a bookstore. Now that things are moving online,
we can hope that all commonly needed court documents will be freely available on
the internet.
17 Aug 2008
Read the book The
Selfish Gene (Dawkins, 1976). Outstanding science book for
the layman, where he presents the thesis that "survival of the
fittest" and evolution are best understood by looking at individual genes
as the units of survival, rather than species (or individuals). His
arguments are compelling, and he uses the argument that the genes are (blindly,
unintentionally) engaged in a competition to see which genes can reproduce
themselves most successfully, most widely. He presents plants and animals
as unwitting "vehicles" that merely provide temporary homes for the
genes. And what happens when these temporary homes become conscious and
realize that they contain genes? Why, we start manipulating the genes to
our own advantage: We tailor them so we can live longer, live healthier,
live happier.
Read The Vital Link: The Story of the Suez Canal (1968) a rather
cheesy history book, but I was struck by the figure of President Gamal Abdel
Nasser. He was a great man: he led the 1952 Egyptian
revolution, which ousted the corrupt monarchy; he established a democratic
republic in Egypt; he evicted the French and British colonial companies that ran
the Suez canal; he created an Egyptian organization to manage and operate
the canal (much like Panama did in the 1990s); and he tried to establish a union
with other Arabic countries in the Mideast - the United Arab Republic - although
it only lasted a few years.
16 Aug 2008
Read the book The
Case For Mars (Zubrin, 1996). Very bold proposal to get
humans to Mars: somewhat bucking the NASA bureaucracy: they want
HUGE expeditions, with lots of massive hardware, lots of astronauts.
Zubrin is a bit of an iconoclast: he says that you only need a few people
(certainly not a pilot or captain or doctor); and that current technology (e.g.
Saturn V rockets) will work. His key proposal is to first send an unmanned
rocked to Mars and it contains (1) a large tank of Hydrogen; (2) a
couple of large empty tanks; and (3) a machine that generates methane and water
from the Carbon Dioxide that is present in Mars' atmosphere (5H + CO2 -> H2O
+ CH4). It would be powered by a nuclear reactor. Humans
would then follow several months later, on a small, lightweight vehicle that doesn't
contain any fuel for the return journey. His plan has very few
parts, and he doesn't use the space station, or the Moon (as a stopping
point). His proposal is very well set-out, but he points out (and I
can believe him) that many rice bowls in NASA would be insulted by his proposal,
so lots of entrenched interests argue against it (the Space Station advocates,
the Astronauts, the engineers, the new-technology advocates). This book is
12 years old, and I'm supposing that his ideas are still on the back burner,
since I haven't heard much about is proposal, which he dubs "Mars
Direct".
In the book, he makes a
point that I've been thinking about but have not articulated: He wonders
why technological innovation has stalled since around 1980. He points out
that from 1900 to 1980 we had incredible technological explosion on our
planet: automobiles, telephones, radio, nuclear power, televisions,
computers, internet. But something has stalled since
then: we don't have flying cars, mag-lev trains, hologram communication,
fusion, movie-phones, tele-portation, pollution-free energy, or colonies on the
moon. And he is right: we have stalled, as if we have hit the
limits of human innovation. (His point in bringing this up is to
bolster his argument for Mars colonization: he claims that establishing a
settlement on Mars will open a new frontier, and prompt humanity to become
incredibly inventive to solve the challenges the settlers will face).
But there is one technological innovation happening now that is revolutionary:
Genetic engineering.
Read an article today
about "dead zones" in the oceans ... places that are oxygen starved
(hypoxia). The article blames algae abundance, caused by fertilizer
run-off. I just don't get the connection: algae does photosynthesis
and produces oxygen. I'm not sure how algae would harm fish
and other animals in the ocean (or lakes, as is often claimed
inland). Okay, I did some quick web research (meaning
"unreliable" :-) and it says the problem is caused because the algae
die, and then fall to the ocean/lake floor, and the decomposition process
consumes oxygen. I'm still not persuaded. I would think that the
oxygen the algae produce while alive would exceed any oxygen consumed during
decomposition. And how is the oxygen consumed? Are bacteria
eating the algae corpses and somehow using oxygen in the process?
And what about other ocean plants, like seaweed (say in the Monterrey Bay) ...
as the seaweed dies and decomposes, why isn't that sucking-up the oxygen on the
ocean floor?
4 Aug 2008
Saw the movie The
Battle of Algiers. Great movie shot in 1966, four years after the
Algerian war of independence. The Algerian author Saadi Yasef hired
an Italian film company to make a movie about the revolution, and the result is
an outstanding black-and-white movie. Half documentary, half fiction,
well-paced. Surprisingly, it is balanced to show the French point of view,
and to emphasize that both sides engaged in unethical behavior.
3 Aug 2008
Skimmed the book The
Ten Most Beautiful Experiments, by G. Johnson (2008). Very, very nice
book for the layman, though the absence of graphs and formulae make it a bit
shallow for the scientist. The experiments are:
1. Galileo: Gravitational acceleration is constant, not
proportional to weight
2. William Harvey: The heart pumps blood throughout the body; arteries
and veins carry the same blood, with and without oxygen.
3. Isaac Newton: Light is composed of multiple colors, and behaves
like a wave; illustrated by prisms
4. Antoine-Laurent Lavoisier: Discovered oxygen and hydrogen, and showed
that oxygen is used for combustion and respiration
5. Luigi Galvani: Electricity is the primary force used by nerves
to give movement to muscles
6. Michael Faraday: Electric current gives rise to a magnetic
field
7. James Joule: Related gravitational work (weight dropping)
to heat rise in water (via paddles); conservation of energy;
interchangeability of energy types
8. A.A. Michelson: Light travels at a constant velocity,
regardless of relative motion of source and observer
9. Ivan Pavlov: Training dogs to salivate by the sound of a
bell
10. Robert Millikan: Measured the charge of a single
electron, with the famous oil drop experiment
2 Aug 2008
Grade inflation seems
to happen in all spheres of human activity. Consider the following:
- Rock Climbing:
climbs were initially graded 5.1 through 5.10 (latter being hardest) in the
1970s. Then "unclimbable" climbs were conquered, and scores
of 5.11, 5.12, 5.13 etc were invented.
- College grades
- Movie reviews on
IMDB
- Computer games
reviews: top-ranked games on Metacritic
are all recent releases, such as The Orange Box, Bioshock, GTA 4, Gears of
War.
There seem to be two
phenomena here: (1) grades handed-out for new items get higher over the
years; and (2) for a given item, the grades start high (as early reviewers tend
to be more enthusiastic) then gradually decrease as more critical reviewers
weigh-in. Phenomenon (1) is perhaps justifiable, if one considers the
grades in an absolute sense, and one believes that products are getting better
over the years (e.g. movies are getting better because of better special effects
technologies; Likewise, for rock climbing, new training and equipment make
climbs feasible now that were impossible in the 1970s).
Phenomenon (2) is
well-known, and in fact the IMDB movie
ranking includes the formula it uses (a "true bayesian ranking")
that is supposed to counter the effect of "movies with few reviewers tend
to be further away from the mean than those with large numbers of
reviewers". In fact, as I look at todays IMDB "top
250 movies of all time" I see The Dark Knight (just released
last week!) at the top of the list, above The Godfather, Seven Samuri, and Citizen Kane.
Computer games are
quite a bit different from movies, because the absolute quality is improving on
a year-by-year basis, as hardware and software improves. So Doom III
is much better than Doom I: even though Doom I was a much more influential
game, it seems hopelessly outdated by today's standards.
I predict that computer
game scores will have to adopt an extended scoring system, like rock climbers
did, because the computer game scores are now clustered up near 9.6, 9.7,
9.8. Next year, all the good games will get scores of 9.9 and 10.0, and
the following year, they will have to permit scores of 10.1, 10.2 etc in order
to continue. Or, they could just cut all existing grades in half (9.0
becomes 4.5) like some countries with hyper-inflation have
done.
29 July 2008
Just read a
book about Isaac Newton. One
line from the book: "Newton
discovered gravity, formulated the theory of light, and invented calculus.
Then he turned 26." The
book says that he was convinced
that the gravitational attraction of a uniform sphere is equal to the attraction
of a point-mass of the same weight. The
book says he was so convinced about it, that he actually invented integral
calculus to prove it. Which he did. I've tried several times to prove the same thing using
a simple proof, but I couldn't. I
finally looked in a physics book that had the proof, and indeed the proof
requires integration of a rather hairy formula.
28 July 2008
Washington state governors race primary election is soon, and I just got the
voters information pamphlet. Candidate Mohammad Hassan Said has a
Candidate Statement that will surely draw lots of hate mail: "I would
like to sound the alarm, that AIPAC and the Jewist Zionist Lobbies who represent
less that 2% of the American People are using the Unites States through their
mighty powers in the News Media, Financial Institutions, Hollywood and
Entertainment Industry, ... and Congress as proxies to wage war against any
country perceived to be a threat to Israel". This is a
taboo subject in America, and I've only heard a few prominent people approach
it: Ralph Nader, Ted Turner, Jimmy Carter, Ron Paul, Dennis Kucinich, maybe Mike
Gravel. I'd love to see the email that Said receives!
27 July 2008
I volunteered to coach an elementary school math team "Math Is
Cool" (http://www.academicsarecool.com/competitions.php). Not sure if
I'll get to do it: the prior year's coach may or may not return next
year. In any case, I came up with a list of topics, though they'd
have to be geared to 4th and 5th graders:
-
Fibonacci numbers
- Graph theory: bridge problem and 5/6 vertex overlapping graphs
- Mobius strip
- Logic (liar's island)
- Binary numbers, computers, hex
- Paradoxes, proving 0 == 1
- Trigometry - surveying
- Rubik's cube
- Famous numbers (pi, e, i, infinity, etc)
- Archimedian solids
- Prime numbers
- Calculus
- Probability
- Statistics
- Causation vs. Correlation
- Forumlae for areas and volumes
Apropos of kids learning math: an article in Science journal last week
analyzed test scores and shows that girls are just as good as boys at
math. This old wives tale is a slow one to die.
National Geographic this month has an article on ancient Persia, and claims
that the US Post Office motto ("neither rain, nor sleet, ..") comes
from Greek historian Herodotus, who was describing the Persian's royal
communication system, a kind of pony-express along Persia's royal road (circa
500 BC). Wikipedia says that the NY post office's engraving is
"Neither snow nor rain nor heat nor gloom of night stays these couriers
from the swift completion of their appointed rounds," whereas
Herodotus' words are "Neither snow, nor rain, nor heat, nor gloom of night
stays these courageous couriers from the swift completion of their appointed
rounds", so I guess the word "courageous" was dropped.
23 July 2008
I was at Costco a couple of years ago, and in the DVD section, they were
selling Angels in America, which shows a picture on the cover of an angel
hovering over a man. In this conservative part of our country, I
wonder how many customers bought it, only to be surprised that it is a film
about AIDS, showing gays in a positive light.
7 July 2008
Read The Revolution: A Manifesto by Ron Paul (2008). Im
not too familiar with him: 3rd party candidate for president, just dropped
out. Libertarian congressman from Texas. His book is
well-written and concise and has a lot of great ideas. Here are his major
points, divided into two groups: those I support, and those I
oppose. Here are his policies that I agree with:
- Mainstream politicians refuse to discuss many important issues (such as
federal deficit, pre-emptive wars; illegal spying) in a meaningful
way; instead - as a diversionary tactic, politicians discuss trivial
details that _sound_ important but are smokescreens to avoid discussing the
real issue (e.g. they'd rather ridicule a few pork-barrel projects, rather
than having an uncomfortable debate on the national debt).
- The federal government is vastly exceeding its constitutional
authority, violating the 10th amendment (e.g. regulating education; public
funding for arts) usually relying on the commerce clause or the
"general welfare" clause.
- The U.S. should withdraw our troops from most of the 120 (!)
foreign countries they are in, especially the mid-east
- The U.S. should adopt a non-interventionist (not to say
isolationist) foreign policy (only respond when directly attacked); no
empire-building
- All foreign aid should be stopped
- Social security should be optional (or permit donor to select investment)
- The federal deficit should be paid-off, and we shouldn't borrow
- We should stop propping-up Israel with financial aid (although continue
supporting it morally)
- The war on drugs is wasteful and ineffective and should be abolished
- Federal funding for arts (NEA) should be abolished
- Federal funding for education should be abolished
- Marijuana should be legalized, especially for medical purposes
- The federal government should be smaller
- More power should return to individual states
- Only Congress should be able to declare war (Korean
"conflict" set a bad precedent, followed by Vietnam and
Iraq)
- We should immediately withdraw our military from Iraq and Afghanistan
- Our constitution should be strictly interpreted; if circumstances
have changed since the constitution was drafted, then an amendment should be
adopted to reflect the changes (rather than a judicial re-interpretation)
- Politicians refuse to discuss or acknowledge the motivations of terrorists
(instead, they focus on ultra-patriotic sound-bites such as "they hate
us for our freedoms")
- The President should avoid executive orders and signing statements, and
should defer to Congress's legislative intent
- The Patriot act (and related changes to the FISA) is a violation of the
4th amendment protections (due to warrantless wiretaps, and the like) and
should be rescinded: the government should never spy on its own people
- The government works for the people, and should never impose burdens on
them without their express consent
- Welfare and entitlement programs should be abolished, and replaced with
state programs or volunteer efforts
Here are Paul's policies that I disagree with:
- Environmental (federal) laws should be abolished and replaced with state
laws or civil (nuisance / tort) lawsuits
- Military service should be voluntary (no draft)
- The dollar should be tied to gold
- Income tax should be abolished, especially individual income tax
- Abortion policy should be decided by states
- Prayer in school should be decided by states
- Racism should be addressed by individual states
This thin book is silent on a few important topics:
- Lobbyists and special-interest influence in DC
- Term limits
- Gun Control
- Campaign finance reform
- Consumer protection (Paul is silent on this, but it is safe to assume that
he would - like most Libertarians - abolish consumer protection laws and instead rely on civil
lawsuits)
One of the key points of Paul's book is that both major parties in America agree
on all these issues! As a consequence, when debates occur (between
politicians, or by media or pundits commenting on the nation) they focus on side
issues, rather than the substantive issues. Examples: they
debate flat-income-tax vs progressive-income-tax (rather than debate existence
of income tax). They debate staying in Iraq for 1 year vs 5 years (rather
than debate whether we should be there at all). They debate whether
telephone companies should be immune from lawsuits regarding illegal wiretapping
(rather than debate whether the government should wiretap without a warrant).
8 May 2008
Read the poem The Second Coming by Yeats, written during WW
I:
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.
5 April 2008
My homage to Richard:
Richard consumes very little. He never lies. He doesn't compromise. He is very dedicated.
He was born around 1956, in North Hollywood, Calif. Richard went to high school in North Hollywood, where he ran track and
learned to play piano. He also surfed and rode skateboards. One
of his best friends was Steve Bush, who lived a couple of doors down from Rich
in their apartment complex. They liked Creedence Clearwater revival.
After high school, he attended Community College in North Hollywood for two years,
specializing in meteorology. He got a really heavy-duty thermometer at
this time and continues to use it, to this day. During his CC
years, Richard went on two lengthy hikes: Tahoe-to-Yosemite, and the John
Muir trail (Yosemite to Mt. Whitney). These hikes were with his friends
Mark Mitchell, Steve Bush, and Randy Gaebler.
Richard transferred to UC San Diego in 1976, and graduated in 1979 with a
degree in Mathematics. He continued hiking during this
time. Richard and his roommates painted a mural on the interior wall
of their on-campus apartment of a dodecahedron. Richard calculated the
coordinates of all the vertices (about 100, since it was hollowed) with a
calculator.
About this time, Richard performed perhaps his most amazing feat of physical
endurance: he rode his bicycle, solo, from North Hollywood to San
Diego in one day. After visiting with Neal Olander for a few days,
he then turned around and rode back up in one day. This is
remarkable for several reasons: It is about 130 miles each way; the
traffic is horrible; he wore tennis shoes rather than bicycling shoes; he did
not have toe clips or cleats; and Richard's bicycle was a piece of shit: heavy
and slow (although it did have ten speeds).
After college, Richard got a job with the USGS, in Cheyenne, Wyoming.
He worked as a computer programmer in a division of the USGS that
specialized on measuring and mapping the strength of gravity over the
earth. He lived in a room rented from co-worker Rich Stroud, and
they become good friends. Richard did not own a car during this time
(in fact, he did not get his first car until many years later when he moved to
Los Angeles) and he rode his bicycle to work every day, even in freezing, windy
Cheyenne winters. While in Cheyenne, Richard bowled a lot, and even rolled
a 299 once.
Richard took some time off work in 1984 and went on two lengthy trips with friend
Neal Olander: a hitch-hiking trip from San Diego to Alaska (via Wyoming)
then back down to San Diego (via the Seattle ferry). Then a second trip to
Europe on bicycle. They bicycled about 9,000 miles in Europe, then flew
back to New York and started riding westward to California. They were
struck by a car in Ohio, and - though not seriously injured - they terminated
the trip and took the bus back to California (via Boulder, Colorado).
Just as well, they were starting to get on each other's nerves :-)
Richard continued to work in Cheyenne, then moved back to Los Angeles to
marry his wife Marta, who he knew from his earlier years in L.A.
Their daughter Dana was born around 1988 and she is
currently enrolled at UC Santa Cruz. Richard got a job working for a company in
Los Angeles that sells software services to support political candidates (email,
polling, demographics). He has worked there for about 15
years.
Richard is in outstanding physical shape, frequently riding his bicycle to
work, and working out with sit-ups, and running. He enjoys gardening
and working on his home.
Richard got into caving (spelunking) around 2003, and advanced to the point
where he started leading caving trips.
Richard recently measured his house's electricity usage on a daily basis for
a year. He discovered that air-conditioner use in the summer is his
family's biggest energy usage.
Keywords: Richard Nathan Collier. Richard Collier. Rich
Collier.
He has his own web page at http://www.gomonarch.com/rich/Emotional/Rich/index.html
21 March 2008
The Tree Of Life
page I created a few months ago is proving more popular (well popular is perhaps
too strong a word for 100 hits a day) than my previous leader, the Animalia
page. In fact, the Tree of Life got mentioned
on StumbleUpon.com, and resulted in
thousands of visits earlier this month (in the figure below, a single page is
about 20 "requests" so the peak was about 8,000 page-hits per day):
In addition, it got mentioned in the blog j-walkblog.
I think that caused the minor traffic blip around March 13th.
31 Jan 2008
I sent in a heartfelt testimonial to a software company, and it was
published: PowerGrep
Testimonials. Im always happy to help out fellow software engineers.
29 Jan 2008
Read "A history of Pi" (Petr Beckman, 1971) and it says that, in
addition to Galileo's imprisonment in 1633, Giordano Bruno (1548 - 1600) was
burned at the stake by the Catholic church for insisting that the earth goes
around the sun. I need to research that and get more details.
|